PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXUD.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXUD.L achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.50% return.


MXUD.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.69%
YTD
10.40%
6M
11.09%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*

XLKQ.L

1D
-2.18%
1M
13.44%
YTD
23.50%
6M
23.21%
1Y
53.05%
3Y*
36.62%
5Y*
25.27%
10Y*
26.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist
10.40%17.43%25.46%27.86%-19.91%26.81%18.82%3.48%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
23.50%24.49%41.63%59.85%-29.07%35.05%42.15%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MXUD.L and XLKQ.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.85

The correlation between MXUD.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MXUD.L
XLKQ.L

Technology

35.4%
91.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
7.3%

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Industrials

8.6%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

MXUD.L
35.4%
XLKQ.L
91.2%

Financial Services

MXUD.L
11.6%
XLKQ.L
7.3%

Communication Services

MXUD.L
11.3%
XLKQ.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

MXUD.L
10.1%
XLKQ.L

-

Healthcare

MXUD.L
8.6%
XLKQ.L

-

Industrials

MXUD.L
8.6%
XLKQ.L
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

MXUD.L
4.8%
XLKQ.L

-

Energy

MXUD.L
3.6%
XLKQ.L

-

Utilities

MXUD.L
2.3%
XLKQ.L

-

Real Estate

MXUD.L
1.9%
XLKQ.L

-

Basic Materials

MXUD.L
1.8%
XLKQ.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXUD.L
MXUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXUD.LXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.14

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

9.57

+4.53

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXUD.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXUD.LXLKQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.69

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

1.09

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.17

-0.31

Drawdowns

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUD.L and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXUD.LXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-35.00%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-16.81%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-26.96%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.22%

-35.00%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-3.14%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-5.75%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

5.53%

-3.57%

Volatility

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) is 3.28%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that MXUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXUD.LXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

6.83%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

14.92%

-6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

19.61%

-7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

23.32%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

22.22%

-3.76%

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXUD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXUD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

MXUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist
1.05%1.14%1.30%1.47%1.66%0.62%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXUD.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MXUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

MXUD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. MXUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUD.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXUD.L and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer