MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L
MXUD.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist) and IUQA.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MXUD.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while IUQA.L tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MXUD.L returned 13.61%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for IUQA.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXUD.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUQA.L.
Performance
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXUD.L achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than IUQA.L's 8.81% return.
MXUD.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- —
IUQA.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUD.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist | 10.40% | 17.43% | 25.46% | 27.86% | -19.91% | 26.81% | 18.82% | 3.48% |
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 8.81% | 12.50% | 22.46% | 30.92% | -20.74% | 27.56% | 16.09% | 3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXUD.L and IUQA.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MXUD.L and IUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Financial Services
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Communication Services
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Healthcare
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Industrials
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Consumer Defensive
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Energy
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Utilities
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Real Estate
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Basic Materials
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXUD.L
IUQA.L
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXUD.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.35 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.72 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 11.68 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXUD.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 1.93 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.73 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.86 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, roughly equal to the maximum IUQA.L drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUD.L and IUQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXUD.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -33.96% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -7.99% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -18.04% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.22% | -27.77% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -4.87% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.86% | +0.10% |
Volatility
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that MXUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXUD.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 2.78% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 8.27% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 11.27% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 16.29% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 16.71% | +1.75% |
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXUD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IUQA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXUD.L vs. IUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
MXUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while IUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MXUD.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.30% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MXUD.L and IUQA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MXUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUQA.L.
MXUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IUQA.L tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUD.L and 0.20% for IUQA.L.
Find the right allocation for MXUD.L and IUQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer