PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXUD.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXUD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MXUD.L returned 13.61%/yr vs 17.62%/yr for EQQQ.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXUD.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.

Performance

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXUD.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXUD.L achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.56% return.

MXUD.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.69%
YTD
10.40%
6M
11.09%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
—

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.56%
6M
19.25%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
21.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist		10.40%17.43%25.46%27.86%-19.91%26.81%18.82%3.48%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		19.56%19.96%26.41%55.59%-33.50%28.41%47.71%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MXUD.L and EQQQ.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.87

The correlation between MXUD.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MXUD.L
EQQQ.L

Technology

35.4%
57.9%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.2%

Communication Services

11.3%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
3.7%

Industrials

8.6%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
6.6%

Energy

3.6%
0.5%

Utilities

2.3%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.0%

Technology

MXUD.L
35.4%
EQQQ.L
57.9%

Financial Services

MXUD.L
11.6%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Communication Services

MXUD.L
11.3%
EQQQ.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MXUD.L
10.1%
EQQQ.L
11.6%

Healthcare

MXUD.L
8.6%
EQQQ.L
3.7%

Industrials

MXUD.L
8.6%
EQQQ.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

MXUD.L
4.8%
EQQQ.L
6.6%

Energy

MXUD.L
3.6%
EQQQ.L
0.5%

Utilities

MXUD.L
2.3%
EQQQ.L
1.2%

Real Estate

MXUD.L
1.9%
EQQQ.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

MXUD.L
1.8%
EQQQ.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with MXUD.L:
MXUD.L vs. SPY5.LMXUD.L vs. CAPS.LMXUD.L vs. MVEA.LMXUD.L vs. BBUS.LMXUD.L vs. FRUE.LMXUD.L vs. ISDU.LMXUD.L vs. XMVU.L
Often compared with EQQQ.L:
EQQQ.L vs. QQQEQQQ.L vs. QQQMEQQQ.L vs. EQGB.LEQQQ.L vs. CNX1.LEQQQ.L vs. EQQU.LEQQQ.L vs. CSPX.LEQQQ.L vs. XNAQ.L

Return for Risk

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MXUD.L
MXUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MXUD.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.37
2.61

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.43
3.59

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.64

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

13.38

+0.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXUD.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MXUD.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.61

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.08

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.81

+0.04

Drawdowns

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUD.L and EQQQ.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MXUD.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-50.98%

+16.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-11.03%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-22.63%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.22%

-35.27%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.27%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.75%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-7.06%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.00%

-1.04%

Volatility

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) is 3.28%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that MXUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MXUD.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

4.34%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

11.19%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

15.34%

-3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

20.50%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

19.85%

-1.39%

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXUD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXUD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

MXUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than EQQQ.L's 0.23% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist		1.05%1.14%1.30%1.47%1.66%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MXUD.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MXUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

MXUD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. MXUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUD.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXUD.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer