MXSDX vs. GPICX
MXSDX (Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund) and GPICX (GuidepathConservative Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MXSDX returned 2.18%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for GPICX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MXSDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GPICX.
Performance
MXSDX vs. GPICX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXSDX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than GPICX's 0.99% return.
MXSDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
GPICX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- —
MXSDX vs. GPICX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXSDX Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.67% | 5.30% | 4.24% | 5.67% | -4.25% | -0.03% | 4.64% | 5.40% | 0.85% |
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund | 0.99% | 3.49% | 4.73% | 4.87% | -1.67% | 0.08% | -0.23% | 2.30% | 0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXSDX and GPICX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2018 | 0.35 |
The correlation between MXSDX and GPICX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXSDX vs. GPICX — Risk / Return Rank
MXSDX
GPICX
MXSDX vs. GPICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund (MXSDX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXSDX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 2.84 | -1.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 13.88 | -9.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.64 | 69.49 | -50.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXSDX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 4.17 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 2.21 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.80 | -1.47 |
Drawdowns
MXSDX vs. GPICX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXSDX drawdown since its inception was -10.81%, which is greater than GPICX's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXSDX and GPICX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXSDX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -3.10% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.85% | -0.25% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.30% | -0.52% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.63% | -2.79% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -0.56% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 0.05% | +0.15% |
Volatility
MXSDX vs. GPICX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund (MXSDX) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) at 0.27%. This indicates that MXSDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXSDX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 0.27% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.89% | 0.62% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34% | 0.83% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.11% | 1.10% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 1.06% | +0.94% |
MXSDX vs. GPICX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXSDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GPICX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXSDX vs. GPICX - Dividend Comparison
MXSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than GPICX's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund | 3.80% | 3.86% | 4.53% | 4.23% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
MXSDX Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.06% | 3.08% | 4.43% | 2.31% | 1.51% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 2.06% | 1.90% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXSDX and GPICX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXSDX has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to GPICX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXSDX dropped -10.81% vs GPICX's -3.10%.
GPICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXSDX and GPICX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer