MXRLX vs. LTFIX
MXRLX (Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund) and LTFIX (Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, MXRLX returned 9.05%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for LTFIX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MXRLX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTFIX.
Performance
MXRLX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXRLX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly higher than LTFIX's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MXRLX has underperformed LTFIX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while LTFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.
MXRLX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 19.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.66%
LTFIX
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 18.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXRLX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXRLX Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund | 9.73% | 16.52% | 10.39% | 16.96% | -16.86% | 16.12% | 13.50% | 25.56% | -12.99% | 20.69% |
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund | 8.75% | 17.80% | 17.28% | 20.33% | -18.84% | 17.73% | 16.47% | 27.27% | -9.03% | 22.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXRLX and LTFIX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MXRLX and LTFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (10 years) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXRLX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXRLX
LTFIX
MXRLX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXRLX | LTFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.84 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.21 | 7.90 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXRLX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXRLX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXRLX and LTFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXRLX | LTFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.66% | -52.73% | +12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -8.71% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -15.70% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.66% | -26.80% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.95% | -33.50% | +0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.83% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -7.58% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.03% | +0.07% |
Volatility
MXRLX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) is 2.95%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that MXRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXRLX | LTFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 3.49% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 10.64% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 12.88% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 15.60% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 15.80% | +0.31% |
MXRLX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXRLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXRLX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison
MXRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than LTFIX's 8.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund | 8.02% | 8.73% | 8.47% | 4.17% | 8.60% | 5.83% | 3.91% | 6.03% | 6.60% | 3.51% | 3.99% | 4.51% |
MXRLX Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund | 4.20% | 4.61% | 6.48% | 4.42% | 9.59% | 10.39% | 5.64% | 10.54% | 11.75% | 3.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MXRLX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LTFIX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to MXRLX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXRLX dropped -40.66% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.
MXRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXRLX and LTFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer