PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXRLX vs. FFBQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXRLX vs. FFBQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXRLX achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than FFBQX's 14.03% return.


MXRLX

1D
0.31%
1M
4.13%
YTD
9.93%
6M
10.44%
1Y
22.16%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
9.37%

FFBQX

1D
0.68%
1M
5.43%
YTD
14.03%
6M
15.51%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXRLX vs. FFBQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXRLX
Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund
9.93%16.52%10.39%16.96%-16.86%16.12%13.50%8.50%
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
14.03%22.90%16.84%20.67%-18.86%16.47%18.10%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MXRLX and FFBQX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.85

The correlation between MXRLX and FFBQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXRLX vs. FFBQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXRLX
MXRLX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MXRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MXRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FFBQX
FFBQX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFBQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFBQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFBQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFBQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFBQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXRLX vs. FFBQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXRLXFFBQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.28

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.90

14.54

-3.65

MXRLX vs. FFBQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FFBQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXRLX and FFBQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXRLXFFBQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.50

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.73

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.79

-0.39

Drawdowns

MXRLX vs. FFBQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXRLX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, which is greater than FFBQX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXRLX and FFBQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXRLXFFBQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.66%

-31.34%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-9.67%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-15.51%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.66%

-27.60%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-5.97%

-4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.17%

-0.11%

Volatility

MXRLX vs. FFBQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) is 3.23%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that MXRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFBQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXRLXFFBQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

4.18%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

10.39%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

12.67%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

15.10%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

17.25%

-1.09%

MXRLX vs. FFBQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXRLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FFBQX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXRLX vs. FFBQX - Dividend Comparison

MXRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than FFBQX's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
3.32%2.58%5.66%2.07%5.40%6.98%3.62%2.96%0.00%0.00%
MXRLX
Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund
4.19%4.61%6.48%4.42%9.59%10.39%5.64%10.54%11.75%3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MXRLX and FFBQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFBQX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to MXRLX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXRLX dropped -40.66% vs FFBQX's -31.34%.

FFBQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXRLX and FFBQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer