PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXMGX vs. VLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXMGX vs. VLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) and Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXMGX achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than VLIFX's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MXMGX has underperformed VLIFX with an annualized return of 9.01%, while VLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.


MXMGX

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.75%
YTD
2.12%
6M
1.58%
1Y
7.25%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
9.01%

VLIFX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.09%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
-2.29%
1Y
-1.86%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXMGX vs. VLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXMGX
Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund
2.12%2.99%9.02%19.61%-22.82%15.25%23.65%31.28%-2.80%23.89%
VLIFX
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund
-1.36%0.79%7.59%22.11%-9.60%19.76%19.96%35.30%4.65%19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MXMGX and VLIFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1997

0.85

The correlation between MXMGX and VLIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXMGX vs. VLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXMGX
MXMGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MXMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VLIFX
VLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXMGX vs. VLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) and Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXMGXVLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.00

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.11

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

-0.31

+3.20

MXMGX vs. VLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXMGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the VLIFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXMGX and VLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXMGXVLIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

-0.10

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.36

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.65

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.39

-0.10

Drawdowns

MXMGX vs. VLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXMGX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, roughly equal to the maximum VLIFX drawdown of -61.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMGX and VLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXMGXVLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.97%

-61.48%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-11.81%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-17.66%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.33%

-21.91%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.88%

-35.51%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-8.74%

+7.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.80%

-15.66%

+3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

4.15%

-1.15%

Volatility

MXMGX vs. VLIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) is 3.39%, while Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that MXMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXMGXVLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.71%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

10.05%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

13.44%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

16.87%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

17.86%

+1.09%

MXMGX vs. VLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXMGX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VLIFX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXMGX vs. VLIFX - Dividend Comparison

MXMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than VLIFX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MXMGX
Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund
1.65%1.68%3.66%2.39%2.66%4.92%2.74%2.19%6.13%4.53%0.00%
VLIFX
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund
2.19%2.16%0.99%0.03%7.22%8.23%7.81%1.42%5.12%1.61%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXMGX and VLIFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLIFX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to MXMGX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXMGX dropped -60.97% vs VLIFX's -61.48%.

MXMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXMGX and VLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer