PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXMGX vs. VEVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXMGX vs. VEVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) and Vanguard Explorer Value Fund (VEVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXMGX achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than VEVFX's 23.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MXMGX has underperformed VEVFX with an annualized return of 8.77%, while VEVFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


MXMGX

1D
1.31%
1M
-0.75%
6M
3.60%
YTD
3.41%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
5.93%

VEVFX

1D
1.61%
1M
2.40%
6M
14.98%
YTD
23.38%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
10.46%
ALL TIME*
11.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXMGX vs. VEVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXMGX
Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund
3.41%2.99%9.02%19.61%-22.82%15.25%23.65%31.28%-2.80%23.89%
VEVFX
Vanguard Explorer Value Fund
23.38%7.40%13.81%15.29%-14.11%28.14%3.29%26.92%-13.03%12.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MXMGX and VEVFX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2010

0.84

The correlation between MXMGX and VEVFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXMGX vs. VEVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXMGX
MXMGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MXMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VEVFX
VEVFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VEVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXMGX vs. VEVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) and Vanguard Explorer Value Fund (VEVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXMGXVEVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

3.51

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.63

11.05

-9.42

MXMGX vs. VEVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXMGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the VEVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXMGX and VEVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXMGX vs. VEVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXMGX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than VEVFX's maximum drawdown of -47.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMGX and VEVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXMGXVEVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.97%

-47.53%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-10.31%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-27.32%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.33%

-27.32%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.88%

-47.53%

+11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

0.00%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-6.56%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.27%

-0.18%

Volatility

MXMGX vs. VEVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) is 2.89%, while Vanguard Explorer Value Fund (VEVFX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that MXMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXMGXVEVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

4.07%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

11.90%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

17.28%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.06%

20.57%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

22.43%

-3.53%

MXMGX vs. VEVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXMGX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than VEVFX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXMGX vs. VEVFX - Dividend Comparison

MXMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VEVFX's 8.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXMGX
Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund
1.63%1.68%3.66%2.39%2.66%4.92%2.74%2.19%6.13%4.53%0.00%0.00%
VEVFX
Vanguard Explorer Value Fund
8.32%10.26%14.55%2.49%3.85%3.83%0.86%1.47%8.92%3.00%2.26%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXMGX and VEVFX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEVFX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to MXMGX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXMGX dropped -60.97% vs VEVFX's -47.53%.

VEVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXMGX and VEVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer