MXLZX vs. MLLIX
MXLZX (Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund) and MLLIX (MFS Lifetime Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, MXLZX returned 5.30%/yr vs 4.87%/yr for MLLIX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MXLZX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for MLLIX.
Performance
MXLZX vs. MLLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLZX achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than MLLIX's 3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLZX has outperformed MLLIX with an annualized return of 5.30%, while MLLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.87% annualized return.
MXLZX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.62%
MLLIX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 7.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXLZX vs. MLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLZX Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund | 4.58% | 9.92% | 6.22% | 10.36% | -12.33% | 8.53% | 10.83% | 15.41% | -7.03% | 11.09% |
MLLIX MFS Lifetime Income Fund | 3.48% | 9.32% | 5.62% | 9.12% | -11.99% | 6.63% | 10.06% | 13.91% | -2.37% | 8.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLZX and MLLIX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MXLZX and MLLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXLZX vs. MLLIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLZX
MLLIX
MXLZX vs. MLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXLZX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.97 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 8.67 | -0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXLZX vs. MLLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLZX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, which is greater than MLLIX's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLZX and MLLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLZX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -17.32% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -3.86% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.49% | -4.93% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.60% | -16.08% | -4.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.60% | -16.08% | -4.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.64% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -2.14% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.88% | +0.20% |
Volatility
MXLZX vs. MLLIX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) at 1.06%. This indicates that MXLZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXLZX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 1.06% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.82% | 3.66% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 4.51% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 5.95% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.39% | 5.71% | +2.68% |
MXLZX vs. MLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLZX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than MLLIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXLZX vs. MLLIX - Dividend Comparison
MXLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than MLLIX's 7.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLLIX MFS Lifetime Income Fund | 7.43% | 6.01% | 6.26% | 3.70% | 3.92% | 6.12% | 3.18% | 3.80% | 4.20% | 3.56% | 4.21% | 2.51% |
MXLZX Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund | 3.28% | 3.43% | 4.50% | 4.14% | 7.81% | 7.85% | 2.96% | 6.00% | 5.91% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXLZX and MLLIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXLZX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to MLLIX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLZX dropped -20.60% vs MLLIX's -17.32%.
MLLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXLZX and MLLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer