PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLZX vs. DRIQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLZX vs. DRIQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLZX achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than DRIQX's 3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLZX has outperformed DRIQX with an annualized return of 5.30%, while DRIQX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.


MXLZX

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.21%
6M
3.16%
YTD
4.58%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
5.30%
ALL TIME*
4.62%

DRIQX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.44%
6M
1.84%
YTD
3.01%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXLZX vs. DRIQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLZX
Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund
4.58%9.92%6.22%10.36%-12.33%8.53%10.83%15.41%-7.03%11.09%
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
3.01%8.83%5.47%8.17%-14.79%7.79%14.31%14.08%-4.20%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLZX and DRIQX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.61

Over the past year, MXLZX and DRIQX have become more correlated (0.83) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLZX vs. DRIQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXLZX
MXLZX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MXLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIQX
DRIQX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DRIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXLZX vs. DRIQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXLZXDRIQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.90

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

7.47

+0.72

MXLZX vs. DRIQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the DRIQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLZX and DRIQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXLZX vs. DRIQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLZX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIQX drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLZX and DRIQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLZXDRIQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-19.86%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-3.47%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.49%

-5.12%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.60%

-19.86%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.60%

-19.86%

-0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.30%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-3.84%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.88%

+0.20%

Volatility

MXLZX vs. DRIQX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX) at 1.10%. This indicates that MXLZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLZXDRIQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.10%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.82%

3.60%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

4.52%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

7.07%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.39%

6.58%

+1.81%

MXLZX vs. DRIQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLZX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIQX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLZX vs. DRIQX - Dividend Comparison

MXLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than DRIQX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
6.36%4.95%4.53%4.28%6.51%4.54%3.76%2.05%2.23%1.66%1.37%
MXLZX
Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund
3.28%3.43%4.50%4.14%7.81%7.85%2.96%6.00%5.91%2.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLZX and DRIQX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLZX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to DRIQX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLZX dropped -20.60% vs DRIQX's -19.86%.

MXLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLZX and DRIQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer