PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLMX vs. RFXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLMX vs. RFXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) and Rational Special Situations Income Fund (RFXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLMX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than RFXIX's 1.90% return.


MXLMX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.81%
6M
0.92%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
3.44%

RFXIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.90%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLMX vs. RFXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXLMX
Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund
0.81%7.99%5.14%7.89%-11.42%0.96%9.02%3.06%
RFXIX
Rational Special Situations Income Fund
1.90%4.73%8.95%4.08%-0.85%5.30%2.84%1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLMX and RFXIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.48

The correlation between MXLMX and RFXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLMX vs. RFXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLMX
MXLMX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MXLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

RFXIX
RFXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RFXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RFXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLMX vs. RFXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) and Rational Special Situations Income Fund (RFXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXLMXRFXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.06

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

6.87

-4.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

28.10

-19.20

MXLMX vs. RFXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the RFXIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLMX and RFXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXLMX vs. RFXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLMX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, which is greater than RFXIX's maximum drawdown of -12.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLMX and RFXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLMXRFXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.94%

-12.91%

-24.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-0.72%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

-1.05%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.52%

-4.93%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.11%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-0.86%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.18%

+0.47%

Volatility

MXLMX vs. RFXIX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Rational Special Situations Income Fund (RFXIX) at 0.37%. This indicates that MXLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLMXRFXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.37%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

0.78%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

1.40%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.26%

1.96%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.19%

2.94%

+1.25%

MXLMX vs. RFXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than RFXIX's 1.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLMX vs. RFXIX - Dividend Comparison

MXLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than RFXIX's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLMX
Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund
3.25%3.28%3.68%3.16%2.59%3.88%3.59%1.76%3.07%0.45%
RFXIX
Rational Special Situations Income Fund
5.39%5.02%6.69%7.85%6.08%5.04%4.99%1.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLMX and RFXIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLMX has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to RFXIX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLMX dropped -36.94% vs RFXIX's -12.91%.

RFXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLMX and RFXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer