PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLMX vs. MXVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLMX vs. MXVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) and Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLMX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than MXVIX's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLMX has underperformed MXVIX with an annualized return of 3.09%, while MXVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.11% annualized return.


MXLMX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.66%
6M
-0.15%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
1.64%
10Y*
3.09%
ALL TIME*
1.81%

MXVIX

1D
1.65%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.56%
YTD
9.08%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
14.11%
ALL TIME*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXLMX vs. MXVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLMX
Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund
0.37%7.99%5.14%7.89%-11.42%0.96%9.02%11.74%-3.03%4.83%
MXVIX
Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund
9.08%17.30%24.31%25.57%-18.56%29.04%16.96%30.84%-5.32%21.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLMX and MXVIX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2003

0.37

The correlation between MXLMX and MXVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLMX vs. MXVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXLMX
MXLMX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MXLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MXVIX
MXVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MXVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MXVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXLMX vs. MXVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) and Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXLMXMXVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.02

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.51

8.57

-3.07

MXLMX vs. MXVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the MXVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLMX and MXVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXLMX vs. MXVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLMX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum MXVIX drawdown of -58.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLMX and MXVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLMXMXVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.94%

-58.12%

+21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-8.94%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-19.07%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.52%

-24.74%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.52%

-33.82%

+18.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-2.18%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-8.63%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

2.09%

-1.39%

Volatility

MXLMX vs. MXVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) is 0.80%, while Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that MXLMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLMXMXVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

3.44%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.44%

10.08%

-7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

12.72%

-9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.27%

17.30%

-13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.08%

18.21%

-14.13%

MXLMX vs. MXVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MXVIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLMX vs. MXVIX - Dividend Comparison

MXLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than MXVIX's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLMX
Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund
3.27%3.28%3.68%3.16%2.59%3.88%3.59%1.76%3.07%0.45%
MXVIX
Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund
0.35%0.38%0.95%5.22%1.25%4.97%8.27%5.11%10.56%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLMX and MXVIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXVIX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to MXLMX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLMX dropped -36.94% vs MXVIX's -58.12%.

MXVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLMX and MXVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer