PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MXLMX vs. CBLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MXLMX vs. CBLDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MXLMX (Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund) and CBLDX (CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MXLMX returned 1.90%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for CBLDX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MXLMX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for CBLDX.

Performance

MXLMX vs. CBLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) and CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLMX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than CBLDX's 1.83% return.

MXLMX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.81%
6M
0.92%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
3.44%

CBLDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLMX vs. CBLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MXLMX
Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund		0.81%7.99%5.14%7.89%-11.42%0.96%9.02%11.74%-3.46%
CBLDX
CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund		1.83%6.04%7.11%7.71%0.66%7.44%3.59%3.50%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLMX and CBLDX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund

CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund

Often compared with MXLMX:
MXLMX vs. MXIHXMXLMX vs. MXGMXMXLMX vs. NWXHXMXLMX vs. BRWMXLMX vs. CBRDXMXLMX vs. ESIIXMXLMX vs. BWDTX
Often compared with CBLDX:
CBLDX vs. PIMIXCBLDX vs. ICMUXCBLDX vs. JAAACBLDX vs. CLOZCBLDX vs. SEIXCBLDX vs. SWVXXCBLDX vs. FFRHX

Return for Risk

MXLMX vs. CBLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MXLMX
MXLMX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MXLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
CBLDX
CBLDX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CBLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLMX vs. CBLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) and CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MXLMXCBLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.07
3.56

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.08
5.27

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.07

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

6.84

-4.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

27.16

-18.27

MXLMX vs. CBLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the CBLDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLMX and CBLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXLMX vs. CBLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLMX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, which is greater than CBLDX's maximum drawdown of -8.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLMX and CBLDX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MXLMXCBLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.94%

-8.15%

-28.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-0.73%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

-1.05%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.52%

-1.88%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.52%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.10%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-0.31%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.18%

+0.47%

Volatility

MXLMX vs. CBLDX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) at 0.33%. This indicates that MXLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MXLMXCBLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.33%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

1.13%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

1.40%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.26%

1.59%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.19%

1.82%

+2.37%

MXLMX vs. CBLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CBLDX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXLMX vs. CBLDX - Dividend Comparison

MXLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than CBLDX's 6.22% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBLDX
CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund		6.22%6.43%7.12%7.65%5.07%5.13%3.97%2.85%2.18%0.00%
MXLMX
Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund		3.25%3.28%3.68%3.16%2.59%3.88%3.59%1.76%3.07%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

MXLMX and CBLDX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLMX has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to CBLDX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLMX dropped -36.94% vs CBLDX's -8.15%.

CBLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLMX and CBLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer