MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L
MXJP.L (Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF) and XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXJP.L returned 9.38%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for XDJP.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXJP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDJP.L.
Performance
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MXJP.L is traded in USD, while XDJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDJP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXJP.L achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 31.66% return. Over the past 10 years, MXJP.L has underperformed XDJP.L with an annualized return of 9.38%, while XDJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
MXJP.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 32.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
XDJP.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 31.66%
- 6M
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 62.73%
- 3Y*
- 24.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXJP.L Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF | 16.21% | 25.85% | 7.21% | 20.47% | -17.12% | 0.75% | 16.23% | 18.11% | -13.56% | 24.18% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 31.66% | 30.18% | 7.85% | 21.61% | -19.86% | -4.66% | 25.50% | 21.26% | -8.99% | 25.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXJP.L and XDJP.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013 | 0.74 |
The correlation between MXJP.L and XDJP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Technology
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Financial Services
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Communication Services
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Healthcare
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Consumer Defensive
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Basic Materials
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Real Estate
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Utilities
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Energy
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXJP.L
XDJP.L
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXJP.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 4.06 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 13.32 | -4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXJP.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.55 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.57 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.68 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.66 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXJP.L drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, smaller than the maximum XDJP.L drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXJP.L and XDJP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXJP.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -35.79% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -15.36% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -19.06% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.48% | -33.97% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.48% | -35.79% | +3.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.30% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -8.91% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 4.69% | -0.79% |
Volatility
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L) is 4.61%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that MXJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXJP.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 7.26% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.69% | 19.36% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 24.50% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 19.97% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 18.97% | -1.71% |
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXJP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison
MXJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXJP.L Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.47% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXJP.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for MXJP.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXJP.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.
Find the right allocation for MXJP.L and XDJP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer