MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L
MXJP.L (Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF) and VJPN.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Invesco and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXJP.L returned 9.38%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for VJPN.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXJP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPN.L.
Performance
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MXJP.L is traded in USD, while VJPN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VJPN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MXJP.L having a 16.21% return and VJPN.L slightly lower at 15.98%. Over the past 10 years, MXJP.L has underperformed VJPN.L with an annualized return of 9.38%, while VJPN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.
MXJP.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 32.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
VJPN.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 17.06%
- 1Y
- 33.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXJP.L Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF | 16.21% | 25.85% | 7.21% | 20.47% | -17.12% | 0.75% | 16.23% | 18.11% | -13.56% | 24.18% |
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 15.98% | 27.83% | 7.23% | 20.01% | -15.78% | 1.33% | 16.30% | 19.16% | -13.56% | 25.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXJP.L and VJPN.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MXJP.L and VJPN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Technology
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Financial Services
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Communication Services
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Healthcare
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Consumer Defensive
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Basic Materials
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Real Estate
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Utilities
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Energy
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXJP.L
VJPN.L
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXJP.L | VJPN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 2.65 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 8.97 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXJP.L | VJPN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.69 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.54 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.60 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXJP.L drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, roughly equal to the maximum VJPN.L drawdown of -31.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXJP.L and VJPN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXJP.L | VJPN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -31.90% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -12.55% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -14.29% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.48% | -31.90% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.48% | -31.90% | -0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | 0.00% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -7.38% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 3.71% | +0.19% |
Volatility
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) at 4.39%. This indicates that MXJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXJP.L | VJPN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.39% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.69% | 15.93% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 19.72% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 17.71% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 16.98% | +0.28% |
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXJP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VJPN.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Dividend Comparison
MXJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXJP.L Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.23% | 2.54% | 2.47% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 1.94% | 2.04% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MXJP.L and VJPN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VJPN.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPN.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for MXJP.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXJP.L and 0.15% for VJPN.L.
Find the right allocation for MXJP.L and VJPN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer