MXIVX vs. TIVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX).
MXIVX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Dec 1, 1993. TIVFX is managed by American Beacon. It was launched on Aug 1, 1994.
Performance
MXIVX vs. TIVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXIVX vs. TIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIVX Great-West International Value Fund | -1.26% | 39.08% | 5.46% | 18.05% | -15.20% | 10.38% | 10.20% | 22.07% | -15.68% | 25.12% |
TIVFX American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund | 10.36% | 36.15% | 3.73% | 15.43% | -20.57% | 7.53% | 12.61% | 19.38% | -19.87% | 24.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXIVX achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than TIVFX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MXIVX has outperformed TIVFX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while TIVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.91% annualized return.
MXIVX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -10.51%
- YTD
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
TIVFX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 58.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXIVX vs. TIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXIVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TIVFX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXIVX vs. TIVFX — Risk / Return Rank
MXIVX
TIVFX
MXIVX vs. TIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXIVX | TIVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 2.87 | -1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 3.32 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.51 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 4.00 | -2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 16.63 | -9.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXIVX | TIVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.87 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.44 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.37 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXIVX and TIVFX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXIVX vs. TIVFX - Dividend Comparison
MXIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, less than TIVFX's 7.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIVX Great-West International Value Fund | 6.04% | 5.96% | 4.97% | 3.27% | 2.99% | 4.27% | 1.99% | 2.42% | 27.79% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIVFX American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund | 7.99% | 8.82% | 10.23% | 1.66% | 1.39% | 3.65% | 0.34% | 1.69% | 1.37% | 1.28% | 1.57% | 3.01% |
Drawdowns
MXIVX vs. TIVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXIVX drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, which is greater than TIVFX's maximum drawdown of -54.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIVX and TIVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXIVX | TIVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.77% | -54.21% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -13.21% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -36.31% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.18% | -41.51% | +8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -11.69% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.30% | -13.45% | -8.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.22% | 0.00% |
Volatility
MXIVX vs. TIVFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) is 6.34%, while American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that MXIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXIVX | TIVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 7.61% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 14.01% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 19.67% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 18.20% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 17.39% | +1.95% |