PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIVX vs. MXEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIVX vs. MXEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIVX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than MXEGX's 0.80% return.


MXIVX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.05%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.16%
1Y
26.22%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
9.68%

MXEGX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIVX vs. MXEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
8.70%39.08%5.46%18.05%-15.20%10.38%10.20%22.07%-12.42%
MXEGX
Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
0.80%7.07%2.89%4.67%-36.83%53.07%8.60%7.57%-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIVX and MXEGX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2018

0.15

The correlation between MXIVX and MXEGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIVX vs. MXEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIVX
MXIVX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MXIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MXEGX
MXEGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MXEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MXEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIVX vs. MXEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXIVXMXEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.07

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

7.59

+0.95

MXIVX vs. MXEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the MXEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIVX and MXEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXIVX vs. MXEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIVX drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, which is greater than MXEGX's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIVX and MXEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIVXMXEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.77%

-38.48%

-38.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-1.83%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-2.88%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-38.48%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-26.58%

+25.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.16%

-18.16%

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

0.49%

+2.62%

Volatility

MXIVX vs. MXEGX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX) at 1.11%. This indicates that MXIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIVXMXEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

1.11%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

2.38%

+9.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

3.20%

+11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

25.69%

-9.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

20.38%

-0.98%

MXIVX vs. MXEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MXEGX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIVX vs. MXEGX - Dividend Comparison

MXIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than MXEGX's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXEGX
Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
3.61%3.64%4.26%2.08%34.57%31.60%53.76%3.96%0.38%0.00%
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
5.48%5.96%4.97%3.27%2.99%4.27%1.99%2.42%27.79%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIVX and MXEGX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXIVX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to MXEGX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIVX dropped -76.77% vs MXEGX's -38.48%.

MXIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIVX and MXEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer