MXINX vs. FIGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX).
MXINX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Jan 13, 2011. FIGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 3, 2009.
Performance
MXINX vs. FIGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXINX vs. FIGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXINX Great-West International Index Fund | 0.95% | 30.90% | 2.92% | 17.56% | -14.75% | 10.32% | 7.97% | 21.26% | -13.93% | 24.73% |
FIGSX Fidelity Series International Growth Fund | -1.99% | 19.12% | 5.93% | 21.74% | -22.87% | 16.61% | 18.52% | 35.59% | -10.97% | 30.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXINX achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly higher than FIGSX's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MXINX has underperformed FIGSX with an annualized return of 8.09%, while FIGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.60% annualized return.
MXINX
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -6.36%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
FIGSX
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- 13.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXINX vs. FIGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXINX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FIGSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXINX vs. FIGSX — Risk / Return Rank
MXINX
FIGSX
MXINX vs. FIGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXINX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.74 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.16 | +0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.16 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.98 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 3.83 | +2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXINX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.74 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.33 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.55 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.48 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXINX and FIGSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXINX vs. FIGSX - Dividend Comparison
MXINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than FIGSX's 8.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXINX Great-West International Index Fund | 3.31% | 3.34% | 2.20% | 4.38% | 1.80% | 5.73% | 2.45% | 2.64% | 3.55% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIGSX Fidelity Series International Growth Fund | 8.85% | 8.67% | 4.29% | 1.27% | 3.53% | 8.33% | 16.24% | 3.64% | 7.47% | 3.14% | 2.54% | 3.54% |
Drawdowns
MXINX vs. FIGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXINX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum FIGSX drawdown of -34.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXINX and FIGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXINX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -34.47% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -13.89% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.75% | -34.47% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -34.47% | -0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -10.60% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -6.49% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.55% | -0.28% |
Volatility
MXINX vs. FIGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX) is 7.84%, while Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that MXINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXINX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 9.09% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 13.23% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.21% | 19.24% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 17.61% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.54% | -0.59% |