PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIGX vs. MXIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIGX vs. MXIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIGX achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than MXIVX's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MXIGX has underperformed MXIVX with an annualized return of 6.52%, while MXIVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


MXIGX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.50%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.29%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
6.52%

MXIVX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.43%
YTD
8.25%
6M
11.28%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIGX vs. MXIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
3.50%11.53%4.04%16.54%-30.35%5.59%28.93%34.07%-16.91%26.64%
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
8.25%39.08%5.46%18.05%-15.20%10.38%10.20%22.07%-15.68%25.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIGX and MXIVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2003

0.92

The correlation between MXIGX and MXIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIGX vs. MXIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIGX
MXIGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MXIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MXIVX
MXIVX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MXIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIGX vs. MXIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXIGXMXIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.33

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

2.16

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.31

8.08

-6.77

MXIGX vs. MXIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the MXIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIGX and MXIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXIGXMXIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

1.81

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.62

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.48

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.17

-0.03

Drawdowns

MXIGX vs. MXIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIGX drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, smaller than the maximum MXIVX drawdown of -76.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIGX and MXIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIGXMXIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.36%

-76.77%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-11.65%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-13.63%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-29.13%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

-33.18%

-10.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

-1.88%

-7.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.35%

-22.19%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

3.05%

+0.87%

Volatility

MXIGX vs. MXIVX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) at 3.91%. This indicates that MXIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIGXMXIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.91%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

10.93%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

13.96%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

16.01%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

19.42%

+0.13%

MXIGX vs. MXIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MXIVX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIGX vs. MXIVX - Dividend Comparison

MXIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than MXIVX's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
4.95%5.13%2.80%0.00%1.29%7.13%0.88%0.20%13.16%3.77%
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
5.51%5.96%4.97%3.27%2.99%4.27%1.99%2.42%27.79%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIGX and MXIVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXIGX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to MXIVX (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIGX dropped -66.36% vs MXIVX's -76.77%.

MXIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIGX and MXIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer