PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIGX vs. MXINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIGX vs. MXINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIGX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than MXINX's 12.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MXIGX has underperformed MXINX with an annualized return of 6.53%, while MXINX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.86% annualized return.


MXIGX

1D
2.14%
1M
0.21%
6M
1.92%
YTD
4.53%
1Y
8.35%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
6.53%
ALL TIME*
2.97%

MXINX

1D
2.78%
1M
2.19%
6M
7.37%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
26.11%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
8.86%
ALL TIME*
5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXIGX vs. MXINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
4.53%11.53%4.04%16.54%-30.35%5.59%28.93%34.07%-16.91%26.64%
MXINX
Great-West International Index Fund
12.75%30.90%2.92%17.56%-14.75%10.32%7.97%21.26%-13.93%24.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIGX and MXINX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.93

The correlation between MXIGX and MXINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIGX vs. MXINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXIGX
MXIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MXIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MXINX
MXINX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MXINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MXINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXIGX vs. MXINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXIGXMXINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.29

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

2.20

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

8.35

-6.51

MXIGX vs. MXINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the MXINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIGX and MXINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXIGX vs. MXINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIGX drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, which is greater than MXINX's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIGX and MXINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIGXMXINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.36%

-34.59%

-31.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-11.43%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-13.70%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-29.75%

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

-34.59%

-9.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

0.00%

-7.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-8.51%

-15.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

3.02%

+0.96%

Volatility

MXIGX vs. MXINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) is 4.04%, while Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that MXIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIGXMXINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

4.77%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

13.54%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

15.99%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

16.94%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

16.74%

+2.61%

MXIGX vs. MXINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MXINX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIGX vs. MXINX - Dividend Comparison

MXIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than MXINX's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
4.90%5.13%2.80%0.00%1.29%7.13%0.88%0.20%13.16%3.77%
MXINX
Great-West International Index Fund
2.96%3.34%2.20%4.38%1.80%5.73%2.45%2.64%3.55%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MXIGX and MXINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MXINX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to MXIGX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIGX dropped -66.36% vs MXINX's -34.59%.

MXINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIGX and MXINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer