PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXHYX vs. FHYSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXHYX vs. FHYSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West High Yield Bond Fund (MXHYX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXHYX achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly higher than FHYSX's 1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MXHYX has underperformed FHYSX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while FHYSX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.29% annualized return.


MXHYX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.41%
YTD
6.30%
6M
6.12%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
4.85%

FHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
5.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXHYX vs. FHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXHYX
Great-West High Yield Bond Fund
6.30%8.95%7.64%11.14%-11.80%3.65%10.77%14.40%-3.79%3.63%
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
1.19%9.14%6.42%12.77%-13.16%4.49%6.08%15.14%-2.16%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MXHYX and FHYSX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2009

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between MXHYX and FHYSX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXHYX vs. FHYSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXHYX
MXHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MXHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MXHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FHYSX
FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXHYX vs. FHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West High Yield Bond Fund (MXHYX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXHYXFHYSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

2.74

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.17

14.14

+3.03

MXHYX vs. FHYSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FHYSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXHYX and FHYSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXHYX vs. FHYSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXHYX drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, which is greater than FHYSX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXHYX and FHYSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXHYXFHYSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.32%

-21.45%

-31.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-2.44%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.28%

-3.64%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.23%

-16.93%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.28%

-21.45%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.46%

-2.58%

-13.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.47%

+0.25%

Volatility

MXHYX vs. FHYSX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West High Yield Bond Fund (MXHYX) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) at 0.91%. This indicates that MXHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXHYXFHYSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

0.91%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.24%

2.66%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

3.44%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.79%

5.25%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

5.76%

+0.46%

MXHYX vs. FHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXHYX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXHYX vs. FHYSX - Dividend Comparison

MXHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than FHYSX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
6.30%6.28%5.84%5.30%5.27%4.54%5.74%6.18%6.61%6.98%6.45%8.45%
MXHYX
Great-West High Yield Bond Fund
4.38%4.65%4.19%5.45%3.46%3.14%3.66%5.37%8.16%3.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXHYX and FHYSX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXHYX has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to FHYSX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXHYX dropped -53.32% vs FHYSX's -21.45%.

MXHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXHYX and FHYSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer