PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXFS.L is traded in USD, while VWCE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VWCE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXFS.L achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly higher than VWCE.DE's 11.34% return.


MXFS.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
5.43%
YTD
25.90%
6M
29.15%
1Y
52.52%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
10.25%

VWCE.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
4.29%
YTD
11.34%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXFS.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
25.90%33.98%7.21%7.99%-19.20%-3.47%18.07%6.78%
VWCE.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
11.34%23.23%17.30%21.91%-18.24%18.47%15.65%8.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MXFS.L and VWCE.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019

0.68

The correlation between MXFS.L and VWCE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXFS.L
MXFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MXFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MXFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VWCE.DE
VWCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXFS.LVWCE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.42

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

3.19

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

13.71

+1.29

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXFS.L and VWCE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXFS.LVWCE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.35

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.73

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.77

-0.46

Drawdowns

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXFS.L drawdown since its inception was -39.81%, which is greater than VWCE.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFS.L and VWCE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXFS.LVWCE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.81%

-33.91%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-8.91%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-17.27%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.18%

-26.11%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.81%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.32%

-5.43%

-9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.08%

+1.41%

Volatility

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE) at 3.45%. This indicates that MXFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWCE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXFS.LVWCE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.67%

3.45%

+5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.03%

9.26%

+7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

12.12%

+7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

15.28%

+4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

17.33%

+3.29%

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MXFS.L and VWCE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXFS.L vs. VWCE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXFS.L nor VWCE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MXFS.L and VWCE.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXFS.L and VWCE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

MXFS.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VWCE.DE is Global Equities. MXFS.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Total Return (Net) Index, while VWCE.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXFS.L and VWCE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer