MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L
MXFS.L (Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) and MXWO.L (Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXFS.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Total Return (Net) Index, while MXWO.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXFS.L returned 10.25%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for MXWO.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.
Performance
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXFS.L achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly higher than MXWO.L's 9.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MXFS.L has underperformed MXWO.L with an annualized return of 10.25%, while MXWO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
MXFS.L
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 25.90%
- 6M
- 29.15%
- 1Y
- 52.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
MXWO.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXFS.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 25.90% | 33.98% | 7.21% | 7.99% | -19.20% | -3.47% | 18.07% | 19.21% | -15.38% | 35.57% |
MXWO.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | 9.99% | 20.83% | 19.19% | 24.56% | -18.08% | 22.12% | 16.27% | 27.41% | -9.08% | 22.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXFS.L and MXWO.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between MXFS.L and MXWO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Financial Services
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Basic Materials
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Communication Services
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Industrials
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Energy
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Consumer Defensive
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Healthcare
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Utilities
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Real Estate
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXFS.L
MXWO.L
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) and Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXFS.L | MXWO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 3.12 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.00 | 13.34 | +1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXFS.L | MXWO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.19 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.76 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.82 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.86 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXFS.L drawdown since its inception was -39.81%, which is greater than MXWO.L's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFS.L and MXWO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXFS.L | MXWO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.81% | -33.89% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -8.34% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -17.85% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.18% | -25.80% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.78% | -33.89% | -5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -0.45% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.32% | -4.31% | -11.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 1.95% | +1.54% |
Volatility
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) at 3.32%. This indicates that MXFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXWO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXFS.L | MXWO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.67% | 3.32% | +5.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 9.15% | +7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 11.88% | +7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 15.75% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 15.93% | +4.69% |
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MXFS.L and MXWO.L have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXFS.L vs. MXWO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXFS.L nor MXWO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MXFS.L and MXWO.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXFS.L and MXWO.L have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.
MXFS.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MXWO.L is Global Equities. MXFS.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Total Return (Net) Index, while MXWO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD.
Find the right allocation for MXFS.L and MXWO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer