MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE
MXFS.L (Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) and 2B76.DE (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXFS.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Total Return (Net) Index, while 2B76.DE is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MXFS.L returned 7.19%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for 2B76.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXFS.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 2B76.DE.
Performance
MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MXFS.L is traded in USD, while 2B76.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 2B76.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXFS.L achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly lower than 2B76.DE's 28.27% return.
MXFS.L
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 25.90%
- 6M
- 29.15%
- 1Y
- 52.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
2B76.DE
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 28.27%
- 6M
- 26.84%
- 1Y
- 46.32%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- —
MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXFS.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 25.90% | 33.98% | 7.21% | 7.99% | -19.20% | -3.47% | 18.07% | 19.21% | -15.38% | 35.57% |
2B76.DE iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 28.27% | 18.05% | 5.70% | 39.23% | -34.83% | 21.84% | 38.46% | 38.97% | -19.47% | 47.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXFS.L and 2B76.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MXFS.L and 2B76.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MXFS.L
2B76.DE
MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXFS.L | 2B76.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.33 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 1.97 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.00 | 4.28 | +10.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXFS.L | 2B76.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 1.47 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.42 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.69 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXFS.L drawdown since its inception was -39.81%, smaller than the maximum 2B76.DE drawdown of -44.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFS.L and 2B76.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXFS.L | 2B76.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.81% | -44.51% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -23.44% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -25.92% | +9.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.18% | -44.51% | +7.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -0.42% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.32% | -11.44% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 10.80% | -7.31% |
Volatility
MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) at 7.78%. This indicates that MXFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B76.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXFS.L | 2B76.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.67% | 7.78% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 17.97% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 31.39% | -11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 25.33% | -5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 23.42% | -2.80% |
MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXFS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B76.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXFS.L vs. 2B76.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXFS.L nor 2B76.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MXFS.L and 2B76.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXFS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXFS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B76.DE.
MXFS.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while 2B76.DE is Robotics. MXFS.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Total Return (Net) Index, while 2B76.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXFS.L and 0.40% for 2B76.DE.
Find the right allocation for MXFS.L and 2B76.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer