PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXFLX vs. FNSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXFLX vs. FNSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund (MXFLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXFLX achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than FNSDX's 13.75% return.


MXFLX

1D
0.39%
1M
0.45%
6M
4.35%
YTD
5.84%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
6.37%

FNSDX

1D
0.68%
1M
1.03%
6M
10.63%
YTD
13.75%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXFLX vs. FNSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXFLX
Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund
5.84%11.57%7.09%11.99%-14.12%10.22%11.94%18.42%-6.57%2.84%
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
13.75%23.81%14.18%20.65%-18.23%16.65%18.34%25.58%-8.85%7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MXFLX and FNSDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.82

The correlation between MXFLX and FNSDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXFLX vs. FNSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXFLX
MXFLX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MXFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MXFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSDX
FNSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXFLX vs. FNSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund (MXFLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXFLXFNSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.62

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.29

11.32

-3.03

MXFLX vs. FNSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FNSDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXFLX and FNSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXFLX vs. FNSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXFLX drawdown since its inception was -28.46%, smaller than the maximum FNSDX drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFLX and FNSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXFLXFNSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.46%

-30.95%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-9.76%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.29%

-15.44%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.50%

-27.31%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.01%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-5.56%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

2.26%

-0.91%

Volatility

MXFLX vs. FNSDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund (MXFLX) is 2.34%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that MXFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXFLXFNSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

5.44%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.86%

12.04%

-6.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.72%

14.04%

-6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.08%

15.25%

-5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.29%

16.03%

-5.74%

MXFLX vs. FNSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXFLX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSDX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXFLX vs. FNSDX - Dividend Comparison

MXFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than FNSDX's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
4.98%3.87%2.13%2.07%11.45%11.27%4.26%6.31%6.79%2.72%
MXFLX
Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund
3.74%3.95%4.67%4.22%7.28%8.85%4.06%7.19%7.82%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MXFLX and FNSDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNSDX has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to MXFLX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXFLX dropped -28.46% vs FNSDX's -30.95%.

FNSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXFLX and FNSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer