MXFDX vs. SSAFX
MXFDX (Great-West Core Bond Fund) and SSAFX (State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, MXFDX returned 1.34%/yr vs 27.72%/yr for SSAFX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXFDX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SSAFX.
Performance
MXFDX vs. SSAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXFDX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than SSAFX's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MXFDX has underperformed SSAFX with an annualized return of 1.34%, while SSAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.72% annualized return.
MXFDX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.34%
SSAFX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 27.72%
MXFDX vs. SSAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXFDX Great-West Core Bond Fund | -0.20% | 6.76% | 1.52% | 6.20% | -14.70% | -1.56% | 8.02% | 9.19% | -1.12% | 3.27% |
SSAFX State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio | 0.01% | 6.81% | 1.34% | 5.61% | -13.30% | -1.72% | 978.57% | 8.69% | -0.12% | 3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXFDX and SSAFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MXFDX and SSAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXFDX vs. SSAFX — Risk / Return Rank
MXFDX
SSAFX
MXFDX vs. SSAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Bond Fund (MXFDX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXFDX | SSAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.74 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 5.10 | -0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXFDX vs. SSAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXFDX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, which is greater than SSAFX's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFDX and SSAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXFDX | SSAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -18.74% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | -2.74% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.63% | -6.09% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.88% | -18.10% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.90% | -18.74% | -1.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -3.01% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -4.41% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.93% | +0.10% |
Volatility
MXFDX vs. SSAFX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Core Bond Fund (MXFDX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX) have volatilities of 1.22% and 1.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXFDX | SSAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 1.20% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 2.65% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 3.67% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 5.94% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 277.46% | -272.10% |
MXFDX vs. SSAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXFDX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAFX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXFDX vs. SSAFX - Dividend Comparison
MXFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than SSAFX's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXFDX Great-West Core Bond Fund | 2.88% | 2.87% | 3.23% | 2.18% | 1.21% | 2.62% | 3.08% | 2.41% | 2.40% | 1.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSAFX State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio | 4.18% | 3.70% | 3.76% | 3.16% | 2.49% | 1.90% | 2.41% | 2.88% | 2.82% | 2.42% | 2.21% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MXFDX and SSAFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MXFDX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to SSAFX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXFDX dropped -19.90% vs SSAFX's -18.74%.
SSAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXFDX and SSAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer