MXEOX vs. MXBSX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) and Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX).

MXEOX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Jan 4, 2018. MXBSX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Apr 27, 2016.

Performance

MXEOX vs. MXBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) and Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MXEOX vs. MXBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MXEOX Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund	3.61%	32.78%	9.84%	9.67%	-22.34%	-3.49%	18.39%	21.67%	-21.34%
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund	-1.35%	17.70%	11.16%	17.79%	-16.61%	16.82%	13.96%	26.31%	-11.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXEOX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly higher than MXBSX's -1.35% return.

MXEOX

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: -9.99%
• YTD: 3.61%
• 6M: 7.50%
• 1Y: 33.45%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 3.53%
• 10Y*: —

MXBSX

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: -5.69%
• YTD: -1.35%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 12.88%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXEOX vs. MXBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXEOX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBSX's 0.12% expense ratio.

MXEOX

Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund

MXBSX

Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund

Return for Risk

MXEOX vs. MXBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXEOX

MXEOX Risk / Return Rank: 87
MXEOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MXEOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MXEOX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MXEOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MXEOX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MXBSX

MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 49
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXEOX vs. MXBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) and Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MXEOX	MXBSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.02	+0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	1.51	+0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.22	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	1.45	+0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.15	6.47	+2.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXEOX vs. MXBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXEOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the MXBSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXEOX and MXBSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MXEOX	MXBSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	1.02	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.44	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.58	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between MXEOX and MXBSX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MXEOX vs. MXBSX - Dividend Comparison

MXEOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than MXBSX's 5.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MXEOX Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund	0.97%	1.00%	1.36%	2.01%	1.61%	3.42%	1.85%	0.94%	1.00%	0.00%
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund	5.34%	5.27%	7.38%	5.63%	10.66%	11.14%	6.57%	9.46%	8.18%	3.54%

Drawdowns

MXEOX vs. MXBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXEOX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, which is greater than MXBSX's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEOX and MXBSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXEOX	MXBSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.05%	-31.88%	-9.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.95%	-11.16%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.47%	-29.68%	-8.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.73%	-6.47%	-5.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-6.02%	-11.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	2.51%	+1.33%

Volatility

MXEOX vs. MXBSX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) at 5.49%. This indicates that MXEOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXEOX	MXBSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.21%	5.49%	+3.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.79%	9.19%	+4.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.33%	15.96%	+3.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	15.87%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	16.38%	+2.56%