PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXEOX vs. FCEEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXEOX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXEOX achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than FCEEX's 30.02% return.


MXEOX

1D
1.67%
1M
7.46%
YTD
33.08%
6M
34.70%
1Y
58.66%
3Y*
24.99%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*

FCEEX

1D
2.96%
1M
6.82%
YTD
30.02%
6M
31.93%
1Y
54.98%
3Y*
25.96%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXEOX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXEOX
Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund
33.08%32.78%9.84%9.67%-22.34%-3.49%18.39%12.04%
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
30.02%34.81%10.51%12.52%-16.96%-1.29%10.19%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MXEOX and FCEEX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.92

The correlation between MXEOX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXEOX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXEOX
MXEOX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MXEOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXEOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXEOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MXEOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXEOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FCEEX
FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXEOX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXEOXFCEEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.51

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

4.23

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.54

15.97

+0.57

MXEOX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXEOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXEOX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXEOX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXEOX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEOX and FCEEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXEOXFCEEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.05%

-34.68%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-12.98%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-15.47%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.36%

-33.39%

-4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.58%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.10%

-11.20%

-5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

3.42%

+0.23%

Volatility

MXEOX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) have volatilities of 10.96% and 10.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXEOXFCEEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.96%

10.46%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

17.57%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

19.90%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

17.41%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

18.64%

+0.72%

MXEOX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXEOX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXEOX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

MXEOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than FCEEX's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
2.27%3.29%4.17%4.36%4.08%3.38%2.98%0.40%0.00%
MXEOX
Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.75%1.00%1.36%2.01%1.61%3.42%1.85%0.94%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MXEOX and FCEEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MXEOX has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to FCEEX (10.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEOX dropped -41.05% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

MXEOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXEOX and FCEEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer