PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXEGX vs. IBRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXEGX vs. IBRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX) and VY BlackRock Inflation Protected Bond Portfolio (IBRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXEGX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than IBRIX's 2.32% return.


MXEGX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.34%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*

IBRIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.01%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
2.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXEGX vs. IBRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MXEGX
Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
1.59%7.07%2.89%4.67%-36.83%53.07%8.60%7.57%-0.42%
IBRIX
VY BlackRock Inflation Protected Bond Portfolio
2.32%6.11%2.09%4.30%-12.63%5.25%11.04%8.32%-1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MXEGX and IBRIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.80

The correlation between MXEGX and IBRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXEGX vs. IBRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXEGX
MXEGX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MXEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MXEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IBRIX
IBRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IBRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXEGX vs. IBRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX) and VY BlackRock Inflation Protected Bond Portfolio (IBRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXEGXIBRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.27

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

7.06

+3.31

MXEGX vs. IBRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the IBRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXEGX and IBRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXEGXIBRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

0.75

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.14

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.51

-0.34

Drawdowns

MXEGX vs. IBRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXEGX drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than IBRIX's maximum drawdown of -15.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEGX and IBRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXEGXIBRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-15.82%

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.83%

-4.81%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.88%

-5.68%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.48%

-15.82%

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.00%

-0.21%

-25.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.12%

-4.12%

-14.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.87%

-0.40%

Volatility

MXEGX vs. IBRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX) is 0.85%, while VY BlackRock Inflation Protected Bond Portfolio (IBRIX) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that MXEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXEGXIBRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

7.11%

-6.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

7.29%

-5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19%

8.13%

-4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

7.07%

+18.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

5.93%

+14.51%

MXEGX vs. IBRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXEGX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IBRIX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXEGX vs. IBRIX - Dividend Comparison

MXEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than IBRIX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBRIX
VY BlackRock Inflation Protected Bond Portfolio
3.82%3.31%3.87%3.55%4.96%2.68%1.70%2.38%2.51%1.52%0.00%1.41%
MXEGX
Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
3.58%3.64%4.26%2.08%34.57%31.60%53.76%3.96%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXEGX and IBRIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBRIX has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to MXEGX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEGX dropped -38.48% vs IBRIX's -15.82%.

MXEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXEGX and IBRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer