MXEGX vs. EARRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MXEGX (Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund) and EARRX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MXEGX returned 2.13%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for EARRX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXEGX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for EARRX.

Performance

MXEGX vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXEGX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than EARRX's 0.98% return.

MXEGX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.07%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: 4.56%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: —

EARRX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: 3.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXEGX vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MXEGX Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund	1.06%	7.07%	2.89%	4.67%	-36.83%	53.07%	8.60%	7.57%	-0.42%
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A	0.98%	5.46%	5.39%	5.95%	-3.22%	7.50%	5.05%	5.29%	-1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MXEGX and EARRX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2018	0.66

The correlation between MXEGX and EARRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MXEGX vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXEGX

MXEGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
MXEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
MXEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MXEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MXEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MXEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

EARRX

EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 65
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXEGX vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MXEGX	EARRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.91	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	2.82	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	3.51	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.25	13.35	-5.10

MXEGX vs. EARRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the EARRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXEGX and EARRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MXEGX vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXEGX drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than EARRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEGX and EARRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXEGX	EARRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.48%	-10.27%	-28.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.83%	-0.88%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.88%	-1.18%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.48%	-6.39%	-32.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-10.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.39%	-0.69%	-25.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.16%	-1.08%	-17.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	0.23%	+0.26%

Volatility

MXEGX vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXEGX) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.74%. This indicates that MXEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXEGX	EARRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	0.74%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.36%	1.28%	+1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19%	1.62%	+1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.68%	2.78%	+22.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	2.72%	+17.66%

MXEGX vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXEGX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXEGX vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison

MXEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than EARRX's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A	3.85%	4.36%	3.83%	4.24%	4.82%	3.32%	2.02%	2.46%	2.67%	1.90%	2.00%	1.73%
MXEGX Great-West Core Strategies: Inflation-Protected Securities Fund	3.60%	3.64%	4.26%	2.08%	34.57%	31.60%	53.76%	3.96%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXEGX and EARRX in my portfolio?

MXEGX and EARRX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MXEGX or EARRX?

MXEGX has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to EARRX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEGX dropped -38.48% vs EARRX's -10.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EARRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.