PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXBSX vs. FVTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXBSX vs. FVTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6 (FVTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXBSX achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than FVTKX's 13.38% return.


MXBSX

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.81%
YTD
10.07%
6M
10.63%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
10.29%

FVTKX

1D
-0.53%
1M
3.53%
YTD
13.38%
6M
14.98%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXBSX vs. FVTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
10.07%17.70%11.16%17.79%-16.61%16.82%13.96%26.31%-10.30%8.44%
FVTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6
13.38%24.13%14.37%20.86%-18.11%16.79%18.59%25.60%-8.68%9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBSX and FVTKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.82

The correlation between MXBSX and FVTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXBSX vs. FVTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXBSX
MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FVTKX
FVTKX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FVTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FVTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXBSX vs. FVTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6 (FVTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXBSXFVTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.18

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

14.15

-3.23

MXBSX vs. FVTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FVTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBSX and FVTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXBSXFVTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.43

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.70

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.76

-0.12

Drawdowns

MXBSX vs. FVTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, roughly equal to the maximum FVTKX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and FVTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXBSXFVTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-30.94%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-9.81%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-15.35%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-27.12%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.53%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-5.46%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.20%

-0.09%

Volatility

MXBSX vs. FVTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) is 3.33%, while Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6 (FVTKX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that MXBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXBSXFVTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

4.28%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

10.61%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

12.86%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

15.04%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

15.89%

+0.48%

MXBSX vs. FVTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FVTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXBSX vs. FVTKX - Dividend Comparison

MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than FVTKX's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6
5.07%3.87%2.52%2.26%10.84%10.41%4.04%6.19%6.19%2.46%
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
4.79%5.27%7.38%5.63%10.66%11.14%6.57%9.46%8.18%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MXBSX and FVTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVTKX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to MXBSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBSX dropped -31.88% vs FVTKX's -30.94%.

FVTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXBSX and FVTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer