MXBIX vs. PCGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX).
MXBIX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992. PCGTX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995.
Performance
MXBIX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXBIX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBIX Great-West Bond Index Fund | -0.08% | 6.62% | 0.82% | 5.02% | -13.69% | -2.33% | 7.10% | 8.09% | -0.26% | 2.56% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 2.74% | 7.84% | 0.98% | 5.12% | -13.48% | -0.61% | 5.75% | 6.55% | 0.17% | 2.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXBIX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBIX has underperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 1.02%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.63% annualized return.
MXBIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
PCGTX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXBIX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXBIX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank
MXBIX
PCGTX
MXBIX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXBIX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.43 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 2.29 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.69 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 7.64 | -3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXBIX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.43 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.05 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.31 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.97 | -0.88 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXBIX and PCGTX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXBIX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison
MXBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than PCGTX's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBIX Great-West Bond Index Fund | 2.78% | 2.78% | 2.42% | 1.98% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 2.83% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 4.43% | 3.78% | 5.36% | 5.02% | 3.67% | 2.87% | 3.23% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 2.96% | 2.71% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
MXBIX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBIX and PCGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXBIX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -19.34% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -3.10% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.70% | -19.20% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.74% | -19.34% | -0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -1.57% | -4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -1.86% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.09% | -0.13% |
Volatility
MXBIX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX) is 1.54%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that MXBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXBIX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 2.15% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 4.14% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.43% | 6.23% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 7.10% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 5.35% | -0.43% |