MXBIX vs. FSMOX
MXBIX (Great-West Bond Index Fund) and FSMOX (Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, MXBIX returned 3.46%/yr vs 4.13%/yr for FSMOX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXBIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for FSMOX.
Performance
MXBIX vs. FSMOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXBIX achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than FSMOX's 0.77% return.
MXBIX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.94%
FSMOX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 6.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MXBIX vs. FSMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBIX Great-West Bond Index Fund | 0.08% | 6.62% | 0.82% | 2.45% |
FSMOX Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund | 0.77% | 8.52% | 1.45% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXBIX and FSMOX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MXBIX and FSMOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXBIX vs. FSMOX — Risk / Return Rank
MXBIX
FSMOX
MXBIX vs. FSMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX) and Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXBIX | FSMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.46 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 7.96 | -2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXBIX | FSMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.73 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.63 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
MXBIX vs. FSMOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, which is greater than FSMOX's maximum drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBIX and FSMOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXBIX | FSMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -8.65% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -2.84% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.35% | -8.47% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | -1.36% | -4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -1.76% | -4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.87% | +0.08% |
Volatility
MXBIX vs. FSMOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX) is 1.25%, while Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that MXBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXBIX | FSMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.44% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 2.86% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 4.04% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.04% | 6.20% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 6.20% | -1.27% |
MXBIX vs. FSMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMOX's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXBIX vs. FSMOX - Dividend Comparison
MXBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than FSMOX's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMOX Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund | 4.47% | 4.44% | 5.07% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MXBIX Great-West Bond Index Fund | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.42% | 1.98% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 2.83% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXBIX and FSMOX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSMOX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to MXBIX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBIX dropped -19.74% vs FSMOX's -8.65%.
FSMOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXBIX and FSMOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer