PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXBGX vs. PRMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXBGX vs. PRMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXBGX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than PRMYX's 2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBGX has outperformed PRMYX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while PRMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.20% annualized return.


MXBGX

1D
1.33%
1M
-0.08%
6M
6.34%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
9.25%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

PRMYX

1D
0.58%
1M
-0.23%
6M
2.28%
YTD
2.30%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
3.20%
ALL TIME*
3.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXBGX vs. PRMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBGX
Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund
9.12%16.19%10.17%16.47%-15.90%15.69%13.61%25.22%-9.48%18.42%
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
2.30%8.38%6.31%9.82%-4.22%0.02%1.29%8.54%-5.19%5.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBGX and PRMYX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2016

0.64

Over the past year, MXBGX and PRMYX have become more correlated (0.88) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXBGX vs. PRMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXBGX
MXBGX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MXBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PRMYX
PRMYX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PRMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXBGX vs. PRMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXBGXPRMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.76

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

7.09

+1.44

MXBGX vs. PRMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the PRMYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBGX and PRMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXBGX vs. PRMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBGX drawdown since its inception was -30.12%, which is greater than PRMYX's maximum drawdown of -9.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBGX and PRMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXBGXPRMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.12%

-9.74%

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-3.50%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-7.35%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.13%

-9.24%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.12%

-9.74%

-20.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.63%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-1.68%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.87%

+1.07%

Volatility

MXBGX vs. PRMYX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) at 1.44%. This indicates that MXBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXBGXPRMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

1.44%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

3.88%

+4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

4.83%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

5.26%

+9.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

4.50%

+10.56%

MXBGX vs. PRMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBGX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PRMYX's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXBGX vs. PRMYX - Dividend Comparison

MXBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than PRMYX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXBGX
Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund
4.60%5.02%6.86%5.77%11.05%10.66%6.43%9.53%7.86%5.21%0.00%0.00%
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
3.41%3.30%3.15%3.62%7.46%2.47%2.17%2.97%1.73%0.55%1.53%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXBGX and PRMYX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXBGX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to PRMYX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBGX dropped -30.12% vs PRMYX's -9.74%.

MXBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXBGX and PRMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer