PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXAKX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXAKX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund (MXAKX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXAKX achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 13.85% return.


MXAKX

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.34%
YTD
4.98%
6M
5.26%
1Y
12.38%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
6.53%

FDFPX

1D
0.35%
1M
2.01%
YTD
13.85%
6M
15.07%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
21.93%
5Y*
11.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXAKX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXAKX
Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund
4.98%11.13%7.06%11.54%-12.68%9.78%11.50%5.53%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
13.85%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MXAKX and FDFPX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.83

The correlation between MXAKX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXAKX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXAKX
MXAKX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MXAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MXAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXAKX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund (MXAKX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXAKXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.21

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

14.22

-3.43

MXAKX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXAKX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXAKXFDFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.43

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.74

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.81

-0.09

Drawdowns

MXAKX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXAKX drawdown since its inception was -21.92%, smaller than the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAKX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXAKXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.92%

-31.22%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-9.54%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.14%

-15.42%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

-27.41%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.23%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-5.85%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

2.15%

-0.97%

Volatility

MXAKX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund (MXAKX) is 1.93%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that MXAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXAKXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

4.09%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.73%

10.34%

-5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

12.58%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.36%

15.09%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.22%

17.17%

-7.95%

MXAKX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXAKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXAKX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

MXAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than FDFPX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.75%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%0.00%0.00%
MXAKX
Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund
4.52%4.75%4.34%5.07%8.97%8.35%4.90%7.05%6.16%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXAKX and FDFPX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDFPX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to MXAKX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAKX dropped -21.92% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXAKX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer