MWTIX vs. DFIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) and DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX).
MWTIX is managed by Metropolitan West Funds. DFIGX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Oct 18, 1990.
Performance
MWTIX vs. DFIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MWTIX vs. DFIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWTIX Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.48% | 7.51% | 0.77% | 6.02% | -15.49% | -1.32% | 9.00% | 9.10% | 0.36% | 3.43% |
DFIGX DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio | -0.02% | 6.33% | 0.47% | 4.58% | -13.12% | -3.14% | 9.10% | 7.22% | 0.92% | 1.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWTIX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DFIGX's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MWTIX has outperformed DFIGX with an annualized return of 1.64%, while DFIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.90% annualized return.
MWTIX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.64%
DFIGX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.29%
- 10Y*
- 0.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MWTIX vs. DFIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWTIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIGX's 0.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MWTIX vs. DFIGX — Risk / Return Rank
MWTIX
DFIGX
MWTIX vs. DFIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) and DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWTIX | DFIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.74 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.40 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 3.34 | +0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWTIX | DFIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.74 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | -0.05 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.17 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.99 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between MWTIX and DFIGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MWTIX vs. DFIGX - Dividend Comparison
MWTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than DFIGX's 2.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWTIX Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 3.64% | 3.89% | 4.38% | 4.11% | 2.08% | 1.12% | 6.48% | 3.61% | 2.91% | 2.14% | 3.35% | 2.94% |
DFIGX DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.82% | 2.33% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 4.14% | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.57% | 1.66% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
MWTIX vs. DFIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWTIX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, which is greater than DFIGX's maximum drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWTIX and DFIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWTIX | DFIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.58% | -19.56% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -2.58% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.51% | -17.62% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.58% | -19.56% | -1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -7.39% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -3.09% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 1.08% | +0.07% |
Volatility
MWTIX vs. DFIGX - Volatility Comparison
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) at 1.53%. This indicates that MWTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MWTIX | DFIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 1.53% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 2.60% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.89% | 4.42% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 6.21% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.30% | 5.35% | -0.05% |