PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWSTX vs. BGCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWSTX vs. BGCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund (MWSTX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MWSTX having a 1.30% return and BGCIX slightly higher at 1.33%. Over the past 10 years, MWSTX has underperformed BGCIX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while BGCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.22% annualized return.


MWSTX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.62%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
2.87%

BGCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
4.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWSTX vs. BGCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MWSTX
Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund
1.30%6.93%5.17%7.39%-9.59%1.18%4.92%5.84%1.03%3.81%
BGCIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund
1.33%6.55%8.47%8.87%-8.02%3.48%10.71%7.43%-1.78%3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MWSTX and BGCIX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWSTX vs. BGCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWSTX
MWSTX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MWSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MWSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BGCIX
BGCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BGCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BGCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWSTX vs. BGCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund (MWSTX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWSTXBGCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.99

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

4.88

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.10

20.54

-4.44

MWSTX vs. BGCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the BGCIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWSTX and BGCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWSTXBGCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

3.56

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.73

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

1.34

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.35

-0.41

Drawdowns

MWSTX vs. BGCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWSTX drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than BGCIX's maximum drawdown of -10.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWSTX and BGCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWSTXBGCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-10.37%

-26.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-0.99%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.12%

-2.18%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.75%

-9.78%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.75%

-10.37%

-3.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-1.27%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.23%

+0.13%

Volatility

MWSTX vs. BGCIX - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund (MWSTX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) at 0.37%. This indicates that MWSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWSTXBGCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.37%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

0.96%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55%

1.36%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

1.90%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

3.15%

+0.28%

MWSTX vs. BGCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWSTX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BGCIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MWSTX vs. BGCIX - Dividend Comparison

MWSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than BGCIX's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGCIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund
5.75%5.83%7.13%3.33%8.25%3.57%9.87%3.75%6.01%1.16%0.00%5.11%
MWSTX
Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund
5.39%5.69%6.19%6.26%8.59%7.70%5.45%4.14%4.23%3.48%4.24%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MWSTX and BGCIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MWSTX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to BGCIX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWSTX dropped -37.03% vs BGCIX's -10.37%.

BGCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWSTX and BGCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer