MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE
MWSH.DE (Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds from Amundi - MWSH.DE tracks the MSCI World SRI Filtered PAB Index (EUR Hedged) while F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MWSH.DE returned 21.64% vs 24.10% for F50A.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MWSH.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for F50A.DE.
Performance
MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWSH.DE achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly higher than F50A.DE's 12.09% return.
MWSH.DE
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- YTD
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 21.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
F50A.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MWSH.DE Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 14.77% | 10.75% | -2.72% |
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 12.09% | 8.58% | -1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWSH.DE and F50A.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MWSH.DE and F50A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MWSH.DE
F50A.DE
MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (MWSH.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MWSH.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.47 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 2.61 | +6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWSH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.96%, which is greater than F50A.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWSH.DE and F50A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWSH.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.96% | -21.49% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -16.39% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -2.28% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -7.44% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 9.23% | -6.83% |
Volatility
MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (MWSH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that MWSH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F50A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWSH.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 3.24% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 8.31% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 24.40% | -10.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 22.54% | -5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 22.54% | -6.21% |
MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWSH.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MWSH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither MWSH.DE nor F50A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MWSH.DE and F50A.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MWSH.DE.
MWSH.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Filtered PAB Index (EUR Hedged), while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MWSH.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.
Find the right allocation for MWSH.DE and F50A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer