MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) and WSML.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while WSML.L tracks the MSCI World Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MWOZ.L returned 27.68% vs 33.63% for WSML.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MWOZ.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WSML.L.

Performance

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MWOZ.L is traded in GBP, while WSML.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WSML.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWOZ.L achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than WSML.L's 14.85% return.

MWOZ.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 27.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WSML.L

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 14.85%
• 6M: 14.71%
• 1Y: 33.63%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist	10.17%	8.44%
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	14.85%	6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MWOZ.L and WSML.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.77

The correlation between MWOZ.L and WSML.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWOZ.L

MWOZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MWOZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MWOZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MWOZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
MWOZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

WSML.L

WSML.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
WSML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
WSML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
WSML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WSML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
WSML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MWOZ.L	WSML.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.40	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	3.33	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.43	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.16	4.23	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.80	15.86	+0.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the WSML.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWOZ.L and WSML.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MWOZ.L	WSML.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	2.40	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.54	+0.50

Drawdowns

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWOZ.L drawdown since its inception was -18.50%, smaller than the maximum WSML.L drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOZ.L and WSML.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MWOZ.L	WSML.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.50%	-33.63%	+15.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-7.91%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-6.44%	+3.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	2.11%	-0.47%

Volatility

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) is 2.54%, while iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that MWOZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MWOZ.L	WSML.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	4.08%	-1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.27%	10.73%	-3.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	13.96%	-3.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	16.85%	-2.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	18.19%	-4.28%

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWOZ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than WSML.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MWOZ.L vs. WSML.L - Dividend Comparison

MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while WSML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist	1.20%	1.60%
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MWOZ.L and WSML.L in my portfolio?

MWOZ.L and WSML.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MWOZ.L or WSML.L?

On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MWOZ.L or WSML.L?

MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WSML.L.

What is the main difference between MWOZ.L and WSML.L?

MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while WSML.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MWOZ.L and 0.35% for WSML.L.