MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L
MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) and VPAC.L (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD) are both Global Equities funds - MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while VPAC.L tracks the Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MWOZ.L returned 22.33% vs 5.62% for VPAC.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MWOZ.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPAC.L.
Performance
MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MWOZ.L is traded in GBP, while VPAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VPAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWOZ.L achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly higher than VPAC.L's 3.01% return.
MWOZ.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPAC.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- —
MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 10.79% | 8.44% |
VPAC.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD | 3.01% | -2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWOZ.L and VPAC.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWOZ.L
VPAC.L
MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MWOZ.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.17 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 1.27 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 3.30 | +10.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOZ.L drawdown since its inception was -18.50%, smaller than the maximum VPAC.L drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOZ.L and VPAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWOZ.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.50% | -26.87% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -4.94% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.48% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -4.54% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.90% | -0.22% |
Volatility
MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that MWOZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWOZ.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 1.91% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 5.14% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 6.72% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 8.70% | +5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 12.35% | +1.47% |
MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWOZ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VPAC.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MWOZ.L vs. VPAC.L - Dividend Comparison
MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while VPAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 1.19% | 1.60% |
VPAC.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MWOZ.L and VPAC.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPAC.L.
MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while VPAC.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MWOZ.L and 0.50% for VPAC.L.
Find the right allocation for MWOZ.L and VPAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer