MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L
MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - MWOZ.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MWOZ.L returned 27.68% vs 16.29% for INFR.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MWOZ.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.
Performance
MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MWOZ.L is traded in GBP, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWOZ.L achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 9.52% return.
MWOZ.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 27.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFR.L
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 16.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 10.17% | 8.44% |
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.52% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWOZ.L and INFR.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.23 |
The correlation between MWOZ.L and INFR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWOZ.L
INFR.L
MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWOZ.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.27 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 3.13 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.80 | 7.96 | +8.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWOZ.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 1.55 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.52 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOZ.L drawdown since its inception was -18.50%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOZ.L and INFR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWOZ.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.50% | -34.25% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -5.19% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -3.70% | +3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -6.12% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 2.04% | -0.40% |
Volatility
MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) is 2.54%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that MWOZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWOZ.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 3.92% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 8.92% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 10.49% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 12.26% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 14.10% | -0.19% |
MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWOZ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MWOZ.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison
MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than INFR.L's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 3.02% | 2.54% | 2.60% | 2.84% | 2.70% | 2.99% | 3.51% | 3.45% | 4.75% |
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 1.20% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MWOZ.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.
MWOZ.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MWOZ.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.
Find the right allocation for MWOZ.L and INFR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer