MWOZ.L vs. FTFX.L
MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) and FTFX.L (First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD) are both Global Equities funds - MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while FTFX.L tracks the First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MWOZ.L returned 22.33% vs 8.27% for FTFX.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MWOZ.L vs. FTFX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MWOZ.L is traded in GBP, while FTFX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTFX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWOZ.L achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly higher than FTFX.L's 5.43% return.
MWOZ.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTFX.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 8.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- —
MWOZ.L vs. FTFX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 10.79% | 8.44% |
FTFX.L First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD | 5.43% | -1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWOZ.L and FTFX.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWOZ.L vs. FTFX.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWOZ.L
FTFX.L
MWOZ.L vs. FTFX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (FTFX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MWOZ.L | FTFX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.17 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 1.94 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 5.22 | +8.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MWOZ.L vs. FTFX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOZ.L drawdown since its inception was -18.50%, which is greater than FTFX.L's maximum drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOZ.L and FTFX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWOZ.L | FTFX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.50% | -15.71% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -4.14% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.76% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -6.07% | +3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.54% | +0.14% |
Volatility
MWOZ.L vs. FTFX.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (FTFX.L) at 2.00%. This indicates that MWOZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTFX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWOZ.L | FTFX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 2.00% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 6.60% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 8.85% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 10.77% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 10.08% | +3.74% |
Dividends
MWOZ.L vs. FTFX.L - Dividend Comparison
MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while FTFX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTFX.L First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 1.19% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MWOZ.L and FTFX.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while FTFX.L tracks First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust.
Find the right allocation for MWOZ.L and FTFX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer