MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while FLXK.L tracks the Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MWOZ.L returned 22.33% vs 143.02% for FLXK.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MWOZ.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLXK.L.

Performance

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MWOZ.L is traded in GBP, while FLXK.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXK.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWOZ.L achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 77.73% return.

MWOZ.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.45%
• 6M: 9.49%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 1Y: 22.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLXK.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -18.91%
• 6M: 58.85%
• YTD: 77.73%
• 1Y: 143.02%
• 3Y*: 38.65%
• 5Y*: 16.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist	10.79%	8.44%
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF	77.73%	69.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MWOZ.L and FLXK.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.53

The correlation between MWOZ.L and FLXK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWOZ.L

MWOZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MWOZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MWOZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
MWOZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MWOZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FLXK.L

FLXK.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FLXK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FLXK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FLXK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FLXK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MWOZ.L	FLXK.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	3.27	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.37	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.48	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	5.83	-2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	18.65	-5.34

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWOZ.L and FLXK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWOZ.L drawdown since its inception was -18.50%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOZ.L and FLXK.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MWOZ.L	FLXK.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.50%	-41.70%	+23.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-24.62%	+17.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-24.62%	+24.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-17.71%	+14.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	7.71%	-6.03%

Volatility

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) is 2.77%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 19.77%. This indicates that MWOZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MWOZ.L	FLXK.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	19.77%	-17.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	40.39%	-32.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.88%	43.92%	-33.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.82%	27.97%	-14.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.82%	28.13%	-14.31%

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWOZ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MWOZ.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison

MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while FLXK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist	1.19%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MWOZ.L and FLXK.L in my portfolio?

MWOZ.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MWOZ.L or FLXK.L?

On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MWOZ.L or FLXK.L?

MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLXK.L.

What is the main difference between MWOZ.L and FLXK.L?

MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while FLXK.L tracks Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MWOZ.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.