MWOFX vs. CAEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX).
MWOFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Nov 17, 1993. CAEIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
MWOFX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MWOFX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund | -9.21% | 7.17% | 10.68% | 20.63% | -19.28% | 18.33% | 20.23% | 35.37% | -4.94% | 31.13% |
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 7.51% | 32.61% | -7.13% | 5.67% | -17.43% | 6.73% | 61.52% | 33.48% | -19.26% | 29.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWOFX achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 7.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MWOFX having a 9.82% annualized return and CAEIX not far ahead at 10.27%.
MWOFX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -8.62%
- 1Y
- 0.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
CAEIX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 45.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MWOFX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWOFX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MWOFX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank
MWOFX
CAEIX
MWOFX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWOFX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 2.50 | -2.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.19 | 3.25 | -3.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.45 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 4.01 | -3.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 16.83 | -16.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWOFX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 2.50 | -2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.20 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.52 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.04 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between MWOFX and CAEIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MWOFX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison
MWOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, more than CAEIX's 0.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund | 5.97% | 5.42% | 5.14% | 2.09% | 3.60% | 6.25% | 3.13% | 1.86% | 5.00% | 3.43% | 1.68% | 6.08% |
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 0.67% | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.07% | 0.86% | 0.49% | 0.82% | 1.23% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.79% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
MWOFX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOFX and CAEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWOFX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -75.81% | +19.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.82% | -11.07% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.64% | -32.58% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.68% | -37.54% | +5.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.39% | -10.38% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.94% | -49.05% | +37.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.63% | +1.14% |
Volatility
MWOFX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) is 5.35%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that MWOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MWOFX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 7.69% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 12.51% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 18.49% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 19.12% | -3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 19.63% | -3.05% |