PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF - USD Dist (MWOE.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWOE.DE achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.


MWOE.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.66%
YTD
10.64%
6M
10.70%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
10Y*

PPFB.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.18%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MWOE.DE
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF - USD Dist
10.64%7.87%25.72%19.87%0.54%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
2.74%49.11%34.17%9.42%-1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MWOE.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2022

0.10

The correlation between MWOE.DE and PPFB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWOE.DE
MWOE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MWOE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF - USD Dist (MWOE.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWOE.DEPPFB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

1.81

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.79

4.60

+9.19

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWOE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWOE.DE and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWOE.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.30

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.26

-0.06

Drawdowns

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWOE.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.83%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOE.DE and PPFB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWOE.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.83%

-16.60%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-16.60%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.83%

-16.60%

-5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-15.00%

+14.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-4.40%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

6.55%

-4.84%

Volatility

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF - USD Dist (MWOE.DE) is 2.63%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that MWOE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWOE.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

5.11%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

20.18%

-12.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

23.12%

-12.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

16.13%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.41%

16.13%

-2.72%

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MWOE.DE and PPFB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MWOE.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

MWOE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MWOE.DE
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF - USD Dist
0.95%1.33%1.20%0.58%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MWOE.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWOE.DE and PPFB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

MWOE.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while PPFB.DE is Precious Metals. MWOE.DE tracks MSCI World, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWOE.DE and PPFB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer