PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWIGX vs. DBLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) and DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWIGX achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than DBLFX's -0.20% return.


MWIGX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.08%
6M
0.32%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*

DBLFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.48%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
1.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
0.08%7.99%3.82%6.55%-13.01%-1.13%8.41%11.21%4.27%
DBLFX
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.20%7.54%3.04%6.44%-12.76%-0.34%5.61%7.99%0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MWIGX and DBLFX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.83

The correlation between MWIGX and DBLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWIGX vs. DBLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWIGX
MWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLFX
DBLFX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
DBLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) and DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MWIGXDBLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.28

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

3.55

+2.44

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the DBLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWIGX and DBLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.32%, which is greater than DBLFX's maximum drawdown of -17.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWIGX and DBLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWIGXDBLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-17.09%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-2.92%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.88%

-6.05%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.32%

-17.09%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.81%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-2.57%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

1.05%

-0.30%

Volatility

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) is 1.15%, while DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX) has a volatility of 1.29%. This indicates that MWIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWIGXDBLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.29%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

2.86%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

3.67%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

5.26%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.76%

4.30%

+0.46%

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWIGX has a 1.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLFX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Dividend Comparison

MWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than DBLFX's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLFX
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund
4.82%4.87%5.22%4.66%3.99%3.12%3.17%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.95%3.59%
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.06%3.70%4.52%4.97%6.33%4.25%9.21%12.03%3.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MWIGX and DBLFX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBLFX has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to MWIGX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWIGX dropped -18.32% vs DBLFX's -17.09%.

MWIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWIGX and DBLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer