PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWIGX vs. DBLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) and DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWIGX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than DBLFX's 0.02% return.


MWIGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.58%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*

DBLFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.06%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
0.46%7.99%3.82%6.55%-13.01%-1.13%8.41%11.21%4.27%
DBLFX
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund
0.02%7.54%3.04%6.44%-12.76%-0.34%5.61%7.99%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MWIGX and DBLFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.83

The correlation between MWIGX and DBLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWIGX vs. DBLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWIGX
MWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLFX
DBLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DBLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) and DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWIGXDBLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.40

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

2.08

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.75

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.72

5.31

+2.41

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the DBLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWIGX and DBLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWIGXDBLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.40

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.13

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.87

-0.16

Drawdowns

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.32%, which is greater than DBLFX's maximum drawdown of -17.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWIGX and DBLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWIGXDBLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-17.09%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-2.92%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.88%

-6.05%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.32%

-17.09%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-1.59%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-2.57%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.96%

-0.25%

Volatility

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) is 1.13%, while DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that MWIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWIGXDBLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.39%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

2.71%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

3.66%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.94%

5.24%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.76%

4.29%

+0.47%

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWIGX has a 1.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLFX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MWIGX vs. DBLFX - Dividend Comparison

MWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than DBLFX's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLFX
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund
4.81%4.87%5.22%4.66%3.99%3.12%3.17%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.95%3.59%
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.05%3.70%4.52%4.97%6.33%4.25%9.21%12.03%3.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MWIGX and DBLFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBLFX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to MWIGX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWIGX dropped -18.32% vs DBLFX's -17.09%.

MWIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWIGX and DBLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer