PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWEQ.L achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 11.59% return.


MWEQ.L

1D
0.28%
1M
1.26%
YTD
7.98%
6M
9.47%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FWRA.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.52%
YTD
11.59%
6M
12.75%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MWEQ.L
Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
7.98%21.96%0.07%
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
11.59%22.37%4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MWEQ.L and FWRA.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.85

The correlation between MWEQ.L and FWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWEQ.L
MWEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FWRA.L
FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWEQ.LFWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.27

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.28

13.70

-5.42

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWEQ.L and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWEQ.LFWRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.32

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.56

-0.35

Drawdowns

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum FWRA.L drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWEQ.L and FWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWEQ.LFWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-16.60%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.74%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.77%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-1.93%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.09%

+0.17%

Volatility

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) is 3.27%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that MWEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWEQ.LFWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.80%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

9.86%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

12.32%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

13.52%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

13.52%

+0.56%

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWEQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MWEQ.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWEQ.L nor FWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MWEQ.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MWEQ.L.

MWEQ.L tracks MSCI World Equal Weighted Net Total Return USD Index, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MWEQ.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWEQ.L and FWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer