PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MWEQ.L is traded in USD, while 2B7S.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 2B7S.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWEQ.L achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than 2B7S.DE's -3.04% return.


MWEQ.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.27%
6M
6.78%
YTD
8.97%
1Y
16.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.44%

2B7S.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.31%
6M
-2.00%
YTD
-3.04%
1Y
-0.65%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MWEQ.L and 2B7S.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWEQ.L
MWEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7S.DE
2B7S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MWEQ.L2B7S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.99

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

-0.11

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.38

-0.24

+7.62

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the 2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWEQ.L and 2B7S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum 2B7S.DE drawdown of -27.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWEQ.L and 2B7S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWEQ.L2B7S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-27.23%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-5.85%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-6.82%

+5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

-12.35%

+10.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.73%

-0.45%

Volatility

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE) at 1.49%. This indicates that MWEQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B7S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWEQ.L2B7S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

1.49%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

5.08%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

7.10%

+5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

8.42%

+5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

8.31%

+5.60%

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWEQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7S.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MWEQ.L vs. 2B7S.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWEQ.L nor 2B7S.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MWEQ.L and 2B7S.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7S.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7S.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MWEQ.L.

MWEQ.L is categorized as Global Equities, while 2B7S.DE is Government Bonds. MWEQ.L tracks MSCI World Equal Weighted Net Total Return USD Index, while 2B7S.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MWEQ.L and 0.10% for 2B7S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWEQ.L and 2B7S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer