MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L
MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDPP.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from iShares and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MVUS.L returned 10.84%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for XDPP.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MVUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XDPP.L.
Performance
MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MVUS.L is traded in GBp, while XDPP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XDPP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVUS.L achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than XDPP.L's 10.57% return.
MVUS.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
XDPP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVUS.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.45% | 3.88% | 20.71% | 3.83% | 5.95% |
XDPP.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C | 10.57% | 9.44% | 27.26% | 19.81% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVUS.L and XDPP.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MVUS.L and XDPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
MVUS.L
XDPP.L
MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVUS.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 3.99 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 14.32 | -7.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVUS.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.78 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.25 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVUS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, which is greater than XDPP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVUS.L and XDPP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVUS.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -20.98% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.39% | -7.28% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -20.98% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.24% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -3.49% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 2.03% | -0.30% |
Volatility
MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) is 2.24%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that MVUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVUS.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 2.62% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.65% | 7.13% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 10.46% | -2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.72% | 13.89% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 13.89% | -0.11% |
MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDPP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MVUS.L vs. XDPP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MVUS.L nor XDPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MVUS.L and XDPP.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDPP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDPP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MVUS.L.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MVUS.L and 0.06% for XDPP.L.
Find the right allocation for MVUS.L and XDPP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer