MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from iShares and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVUS.L returned 12.53% vs 30.12% for S5SD.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for S5SD.L.

Performance

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVUS.L achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than S5SD.L's 9.02% return.

MVUS.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 4.45%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 12.53%
• 3Y*: 10.84%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 11.39%

S5SD.L

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 30.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVUS.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	4.45%	12.03%
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis	9.02%	27.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MVUS.L and S5SD.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.72

The correlation between MVUS.L and S5SD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVUS.L	S5SD.L
Technology	31.0%	38.6%
Financial Services	17.2%	12.0%
Healthcare	13.0%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	10.4%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	4.6%
Communication Services	6.2%	14.5%
Industrials	5.6%	6.8%
Energy	5.0%	4.2%
Utilities	2.7%	0.8%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.9%
Real Estate	0.2%	2.2%

Return for Risk

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVUS.L

MVUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 45
MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MVUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MVUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MVUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MVUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 45

S5SD.L

S5SD.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
S5SD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MVUS.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.89	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	3.93	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.54	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	4.13	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.24	15.94	-8.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVUS.L and S5SD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MVUS.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.89	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	3.09	-2.14

Drawdowns

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVUS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, which is greater than S5SD.L's maximum drawdown of -7.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVUS.L and S5SD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVUS.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.85%	-7.32%	-17.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.39%	-7.32%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.44%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-1.26%	-2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.90%	-0.17%

Volatility

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) is 2.24%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that MVUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S5SD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVUS.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.24%	2.81%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.65%	7.10%	-1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.05%	10.53%	-2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.72%	11.47%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.78%	11.47%	+2.31%

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MVUS.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVUS.L nor S5SD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVUS.L and S5SD.L in my portfolio?

MVUS.L and S5SD.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MVUS.L or S5SD.L?

On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVUS.L or S5SD.L?

S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MVUS.L.

What is the main difference between MVUS.L and S5SD.L?

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MVUS.L and 0.12% for S5SD.L.